Tampilkan postingan dengan label Harriton High. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Harriton High. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 19 April 2010

School In Webcam Spy Case Captured 56,000 Secret Images Of Students

Blake Robbins

It was revealed today in the Blake Robbins v. Lower Merion School District laptop webcam spying case that the school captured 56,000 images of students without their consent, in different states of undress, in their homes, among other places.

Harriton High, one of the schools in Lower Merion School District, initially lied and tried to play down the case, but as anyone can see, it is a sick, gross invasion of privacy that needs to be prosecuted.

The people on the school board involved in this perversion would not like it if it were done to their families. Yet, had no qualms about doing this to others.

RELATED ARTICLES (INTERNAL LINKS):

Truth Comes Out In School Webcam Spying Case

Judge Refuses To Squash Deposition Subpoena In School Webcam Spying Case

New Developments In The School Webcam Spying Case

School IT Techs In Webcam Spying Case On Leave

School’s Illegal Defense For Spying On Kids In Their Homes With Webcams

Webcam Spying Vice Principal Gives Evasive Excuse

Judge Orders School To Desist Webcam Spying

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

STORY SOURCE (EXTERNAL LINKS):

Lower Merion report: Web cams snapped 56,000 images

Truth Comes Out In School Webcam Spying Case

Blake Robbins

The truth has started to come out in the Philadelphia school webcam spying case, Blake Robbins vs. Lower Merion School District, affirming a number of things the Judiciary Report stated all along.

It was revealed today, Harriton High's undisclosed webcam program that secretly spied on students through their school issued laptops, snapped THOUSANDS OF PHOTOS OF KIDS AND THEIR FAMILIES IN THEIR HOMES. Students were snapped without their knowledge and consent in different states of undress and while sleeping, among other things.

This confirms what the Judiciary Report stated weeks ago, that there must be many illegally taken webcam photos of students in their homes, currently there is no smart webcam that can only turn on when drug use or other illegal activity is present, as the way technology works, the cameras can only be programmed to snap indiscriminately every few minutes or hours, depending on what the IT tech programs it to do.

Robbins' lawyer also stated, Carol Cafiero, who ran from a deposition, invoking the Fifth Amendment, is a "voyeur" that derived personal gratification from secretly watching students in their homes through the webcams.

An email disclosed in court this week revealed, Cafiero saw spying on kids in their homes, through the secretly recording webcams, as her "own little soap opera" which is sick. Ironically, several weeks ago, the Judiciary Report wrote, the school board involved in this case perversely tried to have their own sick little reality show via secret webcams spying on unsuspecting people in their homes.

In that same article two months ago the Judiciary Report also stated, the Blake Robbins case has the signs of sick "voyeurism" and "voyeurs" written all over it.

As stated previously, voyeurism is a form of mental illness, sexual dysfunction and deep depravity that is a danger to society, as anyone that would go to the extraordinary lengths to perversely break that privacy barrier and secretly spy on someone in their home, is sick beyond belief and should not be roaming free among the public to victimize others.

As it stands, Florida, New York and California, among other states, have anti-voyeurism laws that criminalize spying on people in their homes. However, in researching the law, remarkably, in Pennsylvania, it is barely an offense.

However, said webcams on the students' laptops had the capability to record audio, which should constitute violations of wiretapping laws, rendering felony charges. One can equate it to child endangerment laws, in that a child does not have to be injured to prove guilt. The mere fact the child was placed in a dangerous situation that endangered the minor is enough for an indictment.

It should not matter that the mic/audio allegedly was not turned, as the webcameras snapped photos, the capability was there and without permission.

In closing, since 2005 the Judiciary Report warned the FBI, DOJ and the US Congress in writing that questionable people have the capability to spy on innocent people in their homes, as has been proven by Kabbalah's invasive criminal conduct against me and that something needed to be done on a government level to rein in this type of perverse criminal misconduct.

Nothing was done and in that, the FBI, DOJ and US Congress, failed miserably, with innocent kids in Philadelphia now paying a price for the government's dereliction of duty, as other perverts believed such misconduct could be done with impunity, hence the Lower Merion School District case.

That's the problem with ignoring crimes being committed against innocent people, deeming it acceptable collateral damage - someone, somewhere else of the same depraved mindset, will get the same idea, think it's okay and cowardly victimize the weakest in society. This time, the victims were defenseless children trying to get an education.

RELATED ARTICLES (INTERNAL LINKS):

Judge Refuses To Squash Deposition Subpoena In School Webcam Spying Case

New Developments In The School Webcam Spying Case

School IT Techs In Webcam Spying Case On Leave

School’s Illegal Defense For Spying On Kids In Their Homes With Webcams

Webcam Spying Vice Principal Gives Evasive Excuse

Judge Orders School To Desist Webcam Spying

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

STORY SOURCE (EXTERNAL LINKS):

Motion: Schools shot thousands of webcam images of students (4-16-10)

School secretly snapped 1000s of students at home (4-16-10)

School Webcam snapped 'partially undressed' kid (4-16-10)

Sabtu, 13 Maret 2010

Michael Jackson Feared Hidden Cameras

"Michael Jackson Bodyguards on GMA Part 2"

Hollywood the industry, is such a perverse institution of smut and degeneracy, the late pop star, Michael Jackson feared hidden cameras being utilized against him, in situations privacy was to be expected by law, requiring his bodyguards to check his hotel rooms for the invasive units. His hidden camera concerns were revealed this week by three of the deceased singer's bodyguards, who made the claim on Good Morning America, during a candid interview about their former boss.

As stated in the lawsuit Aisha v. FBI and the Madonna case preceding it, Hollywood likes to unlawfully and perversely deploy hidden cameras installed by private investigators, in people's homes, hotel rooms and offices, they illegally place under surveillance. They also utilize other items such as illegal wiretaps, mobile phone cloning and hacking, as disclosed in the case of convicted private investigator, Anthony Pellicano.

The practice is quite sick, as it is voyeurism, strictly prohibited by U.S. and international law. Under the law and established legal standards, voyeurism automatically makes the perpetrators and those that hire them to commit said crimes, sex offenders, classed with pedophiles and rapists.

But in sick Hollywood, they believe spying on people 24/7 in violation of all codes of morality and existing legal statutes, is acceptable human behavior, when it is not and never will be. Society was never moving in that unconstitutional and internationally illegal direction, as some sickos in Hollywood committing these acts of criminal perversion comfort themselves in believing. They are the sickest people in existence.

Blake Robbins

Further proof of this fact is the loud outcry regarding the Blake Robbins v. Lower Merion School District case (see article links below), which has enraged people all over the world.

It involves Harriton High School in Pennsylvania issuing laptops to all their students and not informing them or their parents, the units contains a hidden feature - surreptitious software trojan that remotely activates the computers' webcams, spying on students and their families at home or in any other situation they find themselves when the camera turns on.

The school has admitted they did this, but claim the webcam spy feature was only installed to locate lost or stolen laptops. However, neither Blake Robbins or his family reported the laptop lost or stolen, yet it turned on and took photos of him in his bedroom, which a vice principal threw in his face.

Mad-onna

I sympathize with the Robbins, as in the Aisha v. FBI case, regarding obtaining Freedom of Information documents and the agency's blatant criminal negligence, members of Madonna's Kabbalah cult in Miami, on her instruction, would insidiously and harassingly approach me in public, perversely telling me verbatim, in great detail, the things being said and done in my home, due to sick hidden cameras technology she paid a private investigator to implement.

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

Had the FBI done their jobs from 2005, when I went to them with the problem of Madonna engaging in commissioned Anthony Pellicano style harassment and wiretapping, whilst committing criminal copyright infringement, via stealing items from my Copyrighted Catalog, that contains over 12,500 songs, the nasty old pervert wouldn't have felt empowered and emboldened to break the law even further via spying on me in my home, in criminal violation of U.S. law.

The FBI needs to be closed, as they are corrupt. Criminal negligence is the FBI's way, as has been illustrated via a number of other cases, such as Fort Hood, the September 11th attack (FBI Agent Harry Sammit's investigation was stonewalled by Robert S. Mueller, blocked 70 times investigating one of the alternate bombers, which would have prevented the attack), the George Tiller murder, the Pentagon Shooting this month and the Christmas Day 2009 airline bombing, to name a few, where they knew crimes were being committed or were about to be committed and sat back and did nothing.

RELATED ARTICLES

School IT Techs In Webcam Spying Case On Leave

School’s Illegal Defense For Spying On Kids In Their Homes With Webcams

Webcam Spying Vice Principal Gives Evasive Excuse

Judge Orders School To Desist Webcam Spying

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

Kerry Katona's Privacy Violated In Drug Binge

Nasty Perverts

Rabu, 10 Maret 2010

School IT Techs In Webcam Spying Case On Leave

Blake Robbins

The two school IT techs in the Blake Robbins v. Lower Merion School District have been placed on leave, in the fall out from the horrible invasion of privacy case, that saw a 15-year-old boy, photographed unaware in his own bedroom, by a webcam on a Harriton High School issued laptop.

Michael Perbix and Carol Cafiero have been placed on administrative leave and are stating the school ordered them to turn the cameras on each time. On March 6, 2010, they admitted the webcams are programmed to snap photographs of laptop users anywhere they are located "every 15 minutes."

The school IT Techs confessions on March 6, 2010 confirms what the Judiciary Report previously stated on February 22. 2010 in the article titled School’s Illegal Defense For Spying On Kids In Their Homes With Webcams, in that webcams with spyware attached to them, will trigger at timed intervals, as they currently cannot know when someone is seated in front of the unit doing drugs, as the school alleged regarding 15-year-old Blake Robbins, which turned out to be candy, not illegal pills.

Mike Perbix, computer administrator at Harriton High School

This means, as the site previously surmised, there is more than one photo of Blake and other students, who were caught unaware, when the school triggered the webcams to start snapping photos of them in different situations, without their permission or that of their parents.

That's called voyeurism and it is illegal in America. It also constitutes illegal wiretapping, as webcams come standard with sound and video. The intent to violate the law is clearly there, as meetings were taken before this spying program was implemented.

Oh and in more bad news, Lower Merion School District is not the only learning institution in the nation with such surreptitious spying capabilities installed on laptops.

RELATED ARTICLES

School’s Illegal Defense For Spying On Kids In Their Homes With Webcams

Webcam Spying Vice Principal Gives Evasive Excuse

Judge Orders School To Desist Webcam Spying

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

Police get Webcam pictures in school spy case

March 6, 2010 1:12 PM PST - Two IT employees at Pennsylvania's Lower Merion School District have been put on administrative leave, and pictures taken from Webcams on school-issued computers have been turned over to the local police department, according to the attorney of one of the employees now on leave.

Attorney Charles Mandracchia, who represents school district information coordinator Carol Cafiero, told Philadelphia TV station Fox 29 that that "they had a private Web site for some of these pictures for the Lower Marion Police Department to view and they were the only ones who could view it."

In February, the family of Blake Robbins, a 15-year-old student at Harriton High School filed a civil complaint in federal court against the district for allegedly using the Webcam on his school-issued laptop to take a photo of the student while he was at home. The district contends that cameras were only activated if a laptop had been reported lost or stolen. The district has since stopped using the tracking software to activate Webcams.

Speaking about his client and Michael Perbix, the other suspended IT staff member, Mandracchia said, "It was their duty to turn on the camera, but they would only do that if they received a request from the two high schools." He also said the pictures were "taken by the computer itself...every 15 minutes once the computer was open, but it was only supposed to be done if the computer was lost or stolen."...

http://news.cnet.com

Rabu, 24 Februari 2010

Webcam Spying Vice Principal Gives Evasive Excuse


A Harriton High student and her mom speak of the invasive webcam spying

In a carefully worded legal statement, Lynn Matsko, the vice principal of Harriton High in Philadelphia, accused of confronting 15-year-old student, Blake Robbins, with a snapshot taken of him at home, using spyware placed on his school issued laptop, has denied any wrongdoing.

She said and I quote, "At no time have I ever monitored a student via a laptop webcam." I do not like her answer, as it is evasive. She said she did not monitor him at home, which is semantics, as she has refused to explain how she ended up with a webcam taken photo of Robbins at home in his bedroom.

15-year-old Blake Robbins

She can say that, but in the back of her mind, thanks to a lawyer think, "Yes, I did not monitor him in his bedroom, as I am not the school's IT tech, but I was passed the illegally taken photograph of a minor in his bedroom, that was snapped without his permission or that of his parents." 

Robbins father also received confirmation from Lynn Matsko that the school can remotely turn on the laptops, using spyware they installed before handing them out to students.

The school also admitted they have this capability, have used it and now due to a court order, deactivated the spy program, that has the capability to watch students and families in their homes.

Lynn Matsko

Though, the school has admitted activating the spyware to take snapshots of students in different situations, they too are claiming they did not do so to spy. Semantics once again.

It reminds me of America's weed answer to Bob Marley, former President, Bill Clinton, saying he tried marijuana, but never inhaled. If you say so, Bubba. Once again, semantics.

RELATED ARTICLES

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

Lower Merion School Official Says She's Been Tarred in Webcam Spying Case

Posted: Wednesday, 24 February 2010 12:26PM - The Harriton High school assistant vice principal who became embroiled in webcam spying allegations has spoken out for the first time about the case.

Lynn Matsko got special permission from the judge in this case to make a public statement, which has otherwise been under a gag order (see related story)...

The main point of the Lower Merion administrator's nearly six minute statement was to say in her own defense:

"At no time have I ever monitored a student via a laptop webcam."

http://www.kyw1060.com

Judge Orders School To Desist Webcam Spying

Harriton High School

A Pennsylvania judge has ordered Harriton High to desist webcam spying, that saw them turn on the units in people's homes, via school issued laptops.

Video: School Laptop Spying Case Goes to Court

The Judiciary Report is in agreement with the judge on this decision, via issuing an injunction, as there is no excuse in the world for spying on people in their homes.

RELATED ARTICLES

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

Federal judge orders Pa. schools to stop laptop spying

ACLU joins case as 'friend of the court,' claims schools violated students' 4th Amendment rights

February 23, 2010 02:04 PM ET - Computerworld - A federal judge yesterday ordered the Pennsylvania school district accused of spying on its students to stop activating the cameras in school-issued MacBook laptops.

Earlier in the day, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) had asked the same court to let the organization file an amicus curiae, or "friend of the court," brief in support of the 16-year-old high school student's demand that his school be barred from turning on the cameras.

Yesterday, U.S. District Court Judge Jan DuBois issued a consent order that prevents Lower Merion School District of Ardmore, Pa., from "remotely activating any and all web cams embedded in lap top [sic] computers issued to students ... or from remotely taking screenshots of such computers."...

http://www.computerworld.com

Senin, 22 Februari 2010

School’s Illegal Defense For Spying On Kids In Their Homes With Webcams

15-year-old Blake Robbins

Harriton High’s defense, of what amounts to voyeurism, illegal wiretapping and computer intrusion that violated the privacy of minors attending their school, is offensive and insulting to anyone with intelligence.

What is very troubling about the case is the school’s gall, in trying to defend as their right, what is illegal criminal conduct, when any jurist with half a brain can see they flagrantly broke the law.

How can they act as though, spying on people in their homes with cameras, without their knowledge or consent, is acceptable human behavior? Students and their parents are outraged, along with many citizens all over the country, but the school just doesn’t get it.

Harriton High’s management tried to have their own illegal reality show, ensconced in people's homes, with unwitting participants, which constitutes several felonies.

Another issue one cannot get past, is the obvious fact the webcams on the school issued laptops had to have been snapping away indiscriminately, with someone(s) on the school’s end watching live camera feeds or later sorting through what it each unit had captured.

Numerous students were complaining that the webcams would turn on without prompting at various intervals, but the school labeled it a “glitch” full well knowing it was not, as they failed to disclose to parents and students, they have been running an illegal surveillance program, using the webcams on the laptops they gave the children.

If they thought the spy program was above board, why didn't they inform the students and their parents verbally or in writing, "Hey, we've installed webcams and spyware on each computer we gave you, which can trigger at anytime we instruct it to, taking photos and videos, whether you are in your bedroom, bathroom or living room." No mention was made. They would never have told people the truth, as they would be in more trouble than they could ever fathom. You know, like now.

The chances are a million to one that the webcam just happened to catch this young man at the very moment he was popping candy that looked like pills.

Once again, based on the way technology works and claims asserted online by students of Harriton High, the Judiciary Report stands by the belief, the webcams were triggering at repeated intervals over the course of the 14 month program. Then, someone forwarded specific snaps to the vice principal and other members of the faculty that are involved in this scandal.

Mike Perbix (Pervix, is more like it) is one of the computer administrators responsible for the webcam spy program at Harriton High School

The Judiciary Report does not state this to distress people or cause paranoia, but there are technological facts involved that need to be taken into account.

Through the Anthony Pellicano case, the public found out, the private investigator had illegal wiretap software designed to begin recording unlawfully snooped on calls of surveillance subjects, that would trigger when a certain word was spoken over the phone, in an effort to help reduce the amount of calls Pellicano and his criminal staff of 4, would later have to sift through on behalf of Hollywood clients, to get to specific data they requested for personal use or court cases.

For example, a tape was released revealing actor, Tom Cruise, unlawfully had Pellicano wiretap then wife, Nicole Kidman. Say, Kidman would go on and on over the phone about hair, make-up and nail polish, not that Tom wouldn’t like that stuff based on prevalent rumors about his sexuality, Pellicano reportedly could have the software programmed to flag and record calls that specifically mentioned the word “Tom.” It cuts down on time.

The American NSA and its Echelon spy station in Britain, uses a similar technique, that if one says the words “bomb” or “President” over the phone, among other items, the call is recorded and forwarded to a government analyst for further review, to verify one is not a terrorist or criminal, planning to blow up the President of the United States. This has been written about in the press.

But, to my knowledge, there is no commercially available software that can watch for and alert a webcam operator, of when a person is breaking the law on camera. There are motion detectors for cameras, but not one that is available to the public that can alert you when a crime is committed, such as taking drugs in front of a webcam. The webcam or surveillance camera just triggers when it detects motion.

Therefore, there are holes in the school’s story. The Judiciary Report would like for the vice principal of Harriton High, to be interviewed and explain her conduct, such as what she was doing with a webcam photo of a 15-year-old in his bedroom, snapped without his knowledge or that of his family.

There is no good answer to that question, which is why the school keeps answering the query in a deceitful manner, by stating the minor, "Was not punished for it." We didn't ask you that. Did you or did you not have in your possession, a photo of 15-year-old Blake Robbins and or any other students, in their homes. Yes or no. If you say yes, you and all involved deserve massive prison sentences and must be registered as sex offenders.

RELATED ARTICLES

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

The Spy at Harriton High

This investigation into the remote spying allegedly being conducted against students at Lower Merion represents an attempt to find proof of spying and a look into the toolchain used to accomplish spying. Taking a look at the LMSD Staff List, Mike Perbix is listed as a Network Tech at LMSD. Mr. Perbix has a large online web forum footprint as well as a personal blog, and a lot of his posts, attributed to his role at Lower Merion, provide insight into the tools, methods, and capabilities deployed against students at LMSD. Of the three network techs employed at LMSD, Mr. Perbix appears to have been the mastermind behind a massive, highly effective digital panopticon.

PanoMasterMind, I'll be watch-in you - Mike Perbix

The primary piece of evidence, already being reported on by a Fox affiliate, is this amazing promotional webcast for a remote monitoring product named LANRev. In it, Mike Perbix identifies himself as a high school network tech, and then speaks at length about using the track-and-monitor features of LanRev to take surreptitious remote pictures through a high school laptop webcam. A note of particular pride is evident in his voice when he talks about finding a way outside of LANRev to enable "curtain mode", a special remote administration mode that makes remote control of a laptop invisible to the victim. Listen at 35:47, when he says:

"you're controlling someone's machine, you don't want them to know what you're doing" - Mike Perbix

It isn't until 37 minutes into the video till Perbix begins talking about the Theft Tracking feature, which causes the laptop to go into a mode where it beacons its location and silent webcam screenshots out to an Internet server controlled by the school.

We Found the Glitch, Mrs. Buttle

The truly amazing part of this story is what's coming out from comments from the students themselves. Some of the interesting points:

Possession of a monitored Macbook was required for classes

Possession of an unmonitored personal computer was forbidden and would be confiscated

Disabling the camera was impossible

Jailbreaking a school laptop in order to secure it or monitor it against intrusion was an offense which merited expulsion

http://strydehax.blogspot.com

Did Harriton High Get Webcam Spying Idea From "Live Free Or Die Hard"

Did the faculty of Harriton High School in Philadelphia, accused of spying on students and their families in their homes, by secretly using webcams on school issued laptops, get the idea for this criminal misconduct, from the 2007 Hollywood movie “Live Free Or Die Hard.”

Timothy Olephant stars as a disgruntled government computer programmer, turend hacker

There is a scene in the movie, where actor Timothy Olephant, who looks like male impersonator, Ryan Secreast, hacks his way into a computer and turns on the webcam to spy on individuals in a house, while talking to them over the phone, which he also had illegally traced and wiretapped.

This incident is much like Hollywood putting the sick idea of hidden cameras in people’s homes on the map, with the1998 movie “Enemy of the State.”

Harriton High

RELATED ARTICLES

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

The FBI Continues To Break The Law

Is Hollywood Giving Terrorists Ideas

Interviews On School Spying On Kids With Webcams

The Robbins family of the U.S. city, Philadelphia, were interviewed by a number of national network channels, regarding the egregious and criminal violation of their privacy, when faculty of their son Blake’s school, secretly watched him in their home via a school issued laptop.

The webcam was triggered by stealthily placed school software (see: spyware). It snapped photos that a vice principal confronted the 15-year-old boy with, accusing him of taking illegal drugs, via popping pills. It turns out the boy was popping Mike And Ike candies, which is perfectly legal, as it is confectionary, not crack.

Even if the little boy had been in his bedroom hitting the crackpipe like Ike Turner, it does not give the school the right to engage in warantless surveillance, by illegally turning on a webcam, via having it act as a hidden camera and unlawfully photographing and videotaping people in their homes without their knowledge or consent. It is a sick, deplorable, criminal violation of the Constitution.

Even the average judge would not sign a warrant to allow law enforcement to engage in such conduct against a minor. Rarely would they even sign such a warrant regarding an adult, as it is unconstitutional. Yet, the school bypassed the law and terribly violated the Robbins family.

Their daughter, who was also given a school issued laptop stated, she and her friends take the laptops into their respective bathrooms (toilet) when they shower, to listen to music while they bathe.

A number of other students are outraged as well and have come forward to state that on numerous occasions, the on light for the laptops webcams would turn on by itself, leading them to wonder if it was watching and recording them.

15-year-old Blake Robbins

However, the school clearly lied, previously labeling it a glitch. It was disclosed yesterday the school had triggered the webcams to turn on 42 times that they are willing to admit to, but something tells me it was more, as the complaints far outnumber that figure.

The school’s insufficient and illegal excuse is the webcams turn on when a laptop is reported lost or stolen, BUT THE ROBBINS FAMILY NEVER REPORTED THEIR LAPTOP MISSING OR PILFERED. There is no question the school did this.

Therefore, which criminal on Harriton High’s faculty turned on the webcam and spied on the minor in his home and by all accounts, numerous other kids attending the school.

Why did a school vice principal have photos of a 15-year-old in his home, taken by the secretly activated webcam.

Why did the school think they had a right to spy on families in their homes, when the Fourth Amendment expressly forbids such criminal misconduct?

Why did the school’s staff think it was permissible to do something so sick to children attending the school, that they secretly okayed a pedophilic program, not disclosed to parents or students, which granted them the illegal ability to turn on webcams without consent and watch teens and their families in their homes?

What are the names of the individuals that had access to the illegal images and videos of kids and their families, who were secretly watched in their homes, in various states of undress, when the webcams triggered and began filming?

Why is it being claimed the webcams had no sound, when it is a standard feature on such units?

Once again, it is very alarming that America has become a police state, with such serious privacy intrusions. The Constitution, a strong document that was put in place with good reason, as ALL nations need good privacy laws and human rights, is being terribly trampled.

Hopefully, the massive public outcry accompanying this scandal, will draw attention to the terrible issue of people being spied on in their homes via hidden cameras and audio bugs and new legislation will be enacted, with tougher penalties for such invasive crimes.

RELATED ARTICLE

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

School Accused of Using Webcam to Photograph Student at Home

February 19, 2010, 11:13 am - While high school rumor mills are famously productive, the tech blog Gizmodo reported on Thursday that another student in the district claimed that some students had noticed the camera lights on their school-issued Apple laptops apparently turning on at random before the lawsuit was filed. According to the unnamed student:

Frequently, the green lights next to our iSight webcams will turn on. The school district claims that this is just a glitch. We are all doubting this now.

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com

School Officials Likened to "Peeping Toms"

Feb. 20, 2010 - Mom of Teen Viewed Remotely via Webcam Decries It; His Sister Says She and Her Friends Are "Petrified" by It.

(
CBS/AP) The family that sued to get a suburban Pennsylvania school district to stop secretly viewing students at home via webcams on school-issued laptops is blasting the practice, though it's been halted...

Blake Robbins, the teen at the center of the controversy, told Hill it all began when Harriton High School administrators falsely accused him of selling drugs and taking pills; then said they had webcam images to prove it.

Blake says the pictures are of him eating candies.

Blake's mother, Holly Robbins, says she "was panicked" when she learned what was going on. "I thought this was just horrifying, that somebody could, especially the school, come into my home and spy on my son, and my daughter - she's 18 years old. And it was scary. It was like having a Peeping Tom."

Blake's sister, Paige Robbins, told Hill she "can say that on behalf of all of my girlfriends at Harriton, we were very scared, because we don't check to see if the lid is closed when we're changing. We take them in the bathroom when we're in the shower to listen to music. So, we're all petrified. We don't know who's on the other end watching us do whatever."...

http://www.cbsnews.com


Sabtu, 20 Februari 2010

School Spied On Kids In Their Homes With WebCams

Harriton High School has 2,800 students

In deeply disturbing news, indicative of the type of invasive spying the Judiciary Report has alleged previously, as something happening in America, violating citizens privacy, a high school in Pennsylvania has come under fire, for spying on teenage students in their homes, via embedded webcams in laptops the school issued.

Students were unaware, the built-in webcam on their laptops, were secretly being triggered by school staff at Harriton High School, in effect, acting as hidden cameras, watching people in their homes, which is really sick, depraved and illegal.

A family has sued on behalf of their 15-year-old son, Blake Robbins, who received one of the school issued laptops, only to be arrogantly confronted later by an assistant principal, Lynn Matsko, who told him the things he does in his home are unethical. They need to lock that assistant principal up for the next 20-years and ditto for anyone else that engaged in this criminal misconduct.  

The assistant principal haughtily told the child's father, "The district 'could remotely activate the webcam contained in a student's personal laptop . . . at any time it chose and to view and capture whatever images were in front of the webcam' without the knowledge or approval of the laptop's users, the suit says."

This 15-year-old child was in his bedroom unaware of the illegal spying, changing his clothes day after day, in getting ready for school, while people on the faculty of said school, were watching him and other students in their homes, who received the laptops. It could be classified as child pornography.

That is inexcusable, as it is completely sick and depraved beyond words. All involved deserve to go to prison. You have violated privacy and voyeur laws, which coincidentally are sorely ineffective, while engaging in computer intrusion.

I hope you realize those kids are going to need therapy after being violated in this sick manner. It's bad enough when it happens to an adult, but even worse when it transpires against teens.

15-year-old Blake Robbins

The Judiciary Report has been warning for the past few years that the U.S. Congress needs to do something about the nastiness going on, in people illegally spying on others in their homes, using hidden cameras.

Hollywood put this nastiness on the map. Hollywood Cults such as Kabbalah and Scientology have been engaging in such illegal hidden camera spying for years.

It is the sickest thing I have ever come across and found out about it, due to Madonna's completely vile conduct. The FBI was informed of it in 2005, but looked the other way to the sick, invasive crimes, to facilitate criminal copyright theft. For example, Madonna's Kabbalah cult maintains a sick, private password protected website, where depraved members of the cult, such as herself, Guy Ritchie, Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, Rihanna, Jay-Z, Beyonce, Simon Cowell and Simon Fuller, to name a few, view hidden camera feeds, coming from hidden cameras the cult have criminally placed in selected people's homes without their knowledge or consent.

But thanks to the criminal negligence of the FBI/DOJ and U.S. Congress, people now feel it is safe to commit said abomination, to the point children are being preyed on by their own school. This is what happens when you look the other way to serious crimes - other people begin to think they can try it as well. Your negligence and complicity is interpreted as approval.

The Judiciary Report kept warning that the U.S. government needed new legislation to nip this type of hidden camera spying in the bud, but as per usual, criminal negligence is the order of the day.

Once again, as the Judiciary Report asked last week, what kind of sick direction is society going in that such invasive spying is occurring. It is absolutely perverted and disgusting.

These sick voyeurs need to be made examples of, to discourage said conduct, via creating such serious legal penalties, such as 20-years in prison and massive fines, it will discourage others from engaging in similar misconduct.

What is it going to take, to make Congress wake up and put a stop to the nasty spying on people in their homes - for it to happen to them and one of their own.

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

For a few months now, the Judiciary Report has written of the fact, foreign politicians, diplomats and dignitaries are concerned about coming to America, due to the illegal spying coming out of the FBI and Hollywood,  which they do not wish to fall victim to in any measure.

They are concerned about illegal wiretapping on phone lines, cell phone cloning, GPS tracking and worst of all, hidden cameras in hotel rooms and leased properties. Such invasiveness out not to be, as it deprives people of their privacy and dignity, in violation of international human rights laws.

However, once again, the U.S. Congress has failed in this endeavor, by allowing the FBI too much leeway, in which crimes they decide to prosecute and now people feel they can illegally spy on others in their homes without serious consequences. The FBI has tried to play down this problem, but it is a very real issue causing massive damage.  

But then again, the FBI isn't much better, as they've surreptitiously used hidden cameras in people's homes without their knowledge, while placing individuals under surveillance. They were reprimanded in a similar case, as a minor was present in a property they used this terrible type of hidden camera surveillance in.

RELATED ARTICLES

The FBI Continues To Break The Law

All Encompassing Spying

Gang Stalking

Student claims school spied on him via computer webcam

Posted on Fri, Feb. 19, 2010 - A Lower Merion family has set off a furor among students, parents, and civil liberties groups by alleging that Harriton High School officials used a webcam on a school-issued laptop to spy on their 15-year-old son at home.

In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal court, the family said the school's assistant principal had confronted their son, told him he had "engaged in improper behavior in [his] home, and cited as evidence a photograph from the webcam embedded in [his] personal laptop issued by the school district."

The suit contends the Lower Merion School District, one of the most prosperous and highest-achieving in the state, had the ability to turn on students' webcams and illegally invade their privacy.

While declining to comment on the specifics of the suit, spokesman Douglas Young said the district was investigating. "We're taking it very seriously," he said last night.

The district's Apple MacBook laptops have a built-in webcam with a "security feature" that can snap a picture of the operator and the screen if the computer is reported lost or stolen, Young said.

But he said "the district would never utilize that security feature for any other reason." The district said that the security system was "deactivated" yesterday, and that it would review when the system had been used.

Widener University law professor Stephen Henderson said using a laptop camera for home surveillance would violate wiretap laws, even if done to catch a thief.

A statement on the district Web site said the lawsuit's allegations "are counter to everything that we stand for as a school and a community."

The suit says that in November, assistant principal Lynn Matsko called in sophomore Blake Robbins and told him that he had "engaged in improper behavior in his home," and cited as evidence a photograph from the webcam in his school-issued laptop.

Matsko later told Robbins' father, Michael, that the district "could remotely activate the webcam contained in a student's personal laptop . . . at any time it chose and to view and capture whatever images were in front of the webcam" without the knowledge or approval of the laptop's users, the suit says.

It does not say what improper activity Robbins was accused of or what, if any, discipline resulted. Reached at home yesterday, his mother, Holly, said she could not comment on advice of the family's lawyers...

Families in the 6,900-student district reacted with shock. Parent Candace Chacona said she was "flabbergasted" by the allegations.

"My first thought was that my daughter has her computer open almost around the clock in her bedroom. Has she been spied on?"

Victoria Zuzelo, a senior at Harriton, said she and other students had been told about the security feature, and knew the district had the right to search computer hard drives at school.

Some students had taken to covering webcams in school with paper because they thought they might be watched, she said. "But . . . they would never think the school would be watching them at home. I'm not sure who to believe, but I'm hoping it is not true because if it was, it would really be outrageous."

Lillie Coney, associate director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a privacy watchdog group in Washington, said she had not heard of any other case in which school officials were accused of monitoring student behavior at home via a computer. If the allegations are true, she said, "this is an outrageous invasion of individual privacy."

Witold J. Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, told the Associated Press: "School officials cannot, any more than police, enter into the home either electronically or physically without an invitation or a warrant." ...

http://www.philly.com

Remotely accessing a laptop is fairly easy

Posted on Fri, Feb. 19, 2010 - In an age when built-in laptop cameras, no larger than a fingernail, have become commonplace, using them for clandestine surveillance can be a matter of simplicity itself.

Doing so requires one technical tweak to the machine before it is turned over to its user.

First, the computer's administrator would have to enable the laptop to respond to remote access. Once the laptop is connected to the Internet, the administrator could sign on to it without the user knowing.

Then the administrator, over the Internet, could turn on the laptop's camera and microphone as easily as if the machine were in the same room, and record the data - digital audio and video, for example - to the administrator's machine.

"I could take over without the user's knowledge and just activate the webcam," said Jim Martin, who is based in Houston and teaches computer forensics to law enforcement and private industries...

http://www.philly.com